SPEAKER_00 0:18

I want to start today with something I hear constantly in messages, in comments, in sessions, said in a hundred different ways, but always carrying the same weight underneath. He's been to therapy three sessions and he seems so different. Well, he cried when he apologized. He really meant it this time. He's been doing so well for two months. He says he finally understands what he's been doing. He read the book I recommended and he highlighted parts of it and showed me. And every single time I hear those things, I feel something complicated. Because I understand the hope inside them completely. I felt it myself. I know what it's like to hold on to a sign of change, like it's the most important thing in the world. But I've also sat across from too many women years into watching these signs and waiting for them to become something permanent, to let hope go unchallenged. So today I want to talk about something that I think might be the single most important shift a woman can make when she's trying to understand what's real. Stop watching what he says. Start watching what stays the same. Welcome back to Pattern Breakers Collective. I'm Lisa. As always, before we get into today's episode, the usual note throughout this conversation, I will use he when talking about the person causing harm. That reflects my own experience and the audience I work with most often. But I recognize that abuse is not limited to one gender or one type of relationship. Women can be abusive. Men can be survivors. These patterns exist in same-sex relationships, in families, in friendships, in workplaces. If your story looks different, the principles here are still yours. Now, today's episode addresses what is probably the question I receive more than any other. But what if he's really changing? And I want to be direct about what I'm going to do with that question today. I'm not going to give you a simple answer. I'm not going to say abusers never change, because that statement, while meaningful statistically, causes a lot of women to immediately start thinking of the one exception that they know personally and then they stop listening. And I don't want you to stop listening. Instead, I want to teach you how to evaluate change because that's actually more useful than an answer. By the end of this episode, you're going to know what genuine accountability looks like in real, specific, recognizable terms. You're going to understand what performing accountability looks like. You're going to have a framework that you can apply to your own situation, and you're going to understand why the thing that you've probably been watching isn't the thing that tells you anything is real. Let's go. Maybe this time the apology is different. Maybe this time therapy will actually stick. Maybe now that he's finally said it, said the specific thing that you've been waiting for him to say for years, maybe now something will really change. If you've had that thought, I want you to know you're not alone. I'd be willing to bet almost every woman listening has had some version of that conversation with herself. Because hope is one of the most powerful forces in a human life. It's what keeps us going through the impossible seasons. It's beautiful. And it's also the thing that can, without our fully realizing it, become the very mechanism that keeps us stuck. Let me describe a cycle, and I want you to tell me, either out loud or in your body, whether it sounds familiar. Something happens. An explosion, a lie uncovered, a boundary crossed so obviously that it can't be walked back this time. A screaming match that woke the kids, an affair discovered. Whatever this specific event is, it's a rupture, something that has broken the surface in a way that can't be ignored. And then almost immediately things change. He becomes the man that you've been asking him to be. He's present, he's attentive, he initiates connection, he brings coffee, he puts the phone down, he apologizes, sometimes in ways that are genuinely moving. He says the specific words that you've been longing to hear, not generic, I'm sorry, but the words that sound like he actually understands what he did. Maybe he cries, maybe he schedules therapy, maybe he buys the book that you'd recommended six months ago that he dismissed. Maybe he texts his friends that he's working on himself. Maybe he shares a post about accountability on social media. And something in you exhales. For the first time in a long time, there's movement. Something is different. He finally sees it, he finally gets it. You feel hopeful. Not blindly. There's still a quiet caution somewhere in your chest, but hopefully because finally, finally. And then a few weeks later, maybe a few months, something starts to feel familiar. Not all at once. Gradually. The criticism comes back. Not as loud at first, maybe just an edge in the voice. Then the defensiveness. Then an argument that sounds like ones you've had before. Then the blame that creeps back in around the edges. And you find yourself thinking, what happened? Nothing happened. The pattern resumed. Because understanding something genuinely, emotionally, tearfully, movingly understanding it is not the same thing as changing it. That is one of the most painful distinctions in this entire conversation, and it is the one I want you to most hold on to today. Insight is not accountability. Remorse is not accountability. Even genuine, heartfelt, absolutely real regret is not accountability. Accountability is what happens consistently over time when no one is watching and nothing is at stake. That is the only version that counts. And I want to name something here that I think is genuinely important to understand. There is a difference between performing accountability and living it. And some people, not all of them, consciously or manipulatively, become extraordinary at the performance. And I want to be careful here because I'm not saying every person who apologizes and then repeats the behavior is deliberately running a scheme. Sometimes the emotion in the moment is completely real, the regret is real, the desire to be different is real. In that moment, they absolutely mean it. But desire isn't behavior. An intention, however genuine, is not the same thing as change. So what does performing accountability actually look like? Let me give you some specific things to listen for and more importantly, to look past. What if he says, I know I've been controlling? This sounds like insight. It sounds like growth. She told him it was controlling and he heard her and he named it back. But here's the question that matters. What happens the next time she disagrees with him? Does he listen with curiosity or does he still insist that she's remembering it wrong? Does he accept her having a different opinion, or does he still become cold, punishing, or escalating? Because if the behavior in conflict looks identical to what it looked like before he made the statement, then the statement was not accountability. It was just a sentence. And what about when he says, Well, I'm going to therapy? Therapy attendance is not evidence of change. And I mean that. I believe in therapy completely. You all know that. And I've watched therapy be genuinely transformative for people who use it honestly. But I've also had women tell me, well, he's been in therapy for two years. And my first question is always the same. Has his behavior changed? Not has he attended the sessions? Those are completely different questions, and only one of them tells you anything real. Someone can sit in a therapist's office for years and spend the entire time learning vocabulary for their behavior without actually changing the behavior. They can come home with new language and old patterns. They can describe their childhood with impressive depth and still make their partner's life at home exactly what it has always been. Therapy is a tool. What matters is what someone does with it. And what if he says, well, I'm working on myself? How? What specifically is changing? This is not a cruel question, it's a clarifying one. Because working on myself can mean genuine, sustained transformation. And it can also be a sentence that buys another six months. The specific questions worth asking yourself, not necessarily him, are is he becoming easier to disagree with? When I bring something up now, does he move toward it or away from it? Does he repair after conflict or does the silence last until I feel it? Is he becoming someone whose reactions I can predict because they're consistent, or is his behavior still governed by his moods? And what if he starts bringing flowers, planning date nights, becoming affectionate? These are not nothing. Affection can be real, effort can be genuine, but here's what I want you to hold alongside them. None of those things are accountability. Accountability asks, how do I become a safer person? Affection asks, how do I make her stay? Both can coexist, but only one of them changes the pattern. I've had women tell me that after the crisis, after the big revelation, after the breakdown conversation, he became more romantic, more present, more physically affectionate than he'd been in years. And six months later, when things had stabilized, every one of those behaviors quietly receded. The flowers stopped, the affection cooled, the presence disappeared. Because the flowers were not about love becoming visible. They were about access being threatened. And I want to cover different situations because not everyone listening is in the same place. Scenario one, the apology cycle, still in the relationship. So he yells at you during an argument. That night he finds you. He's genuinely distressed. He says, I'm so sorry. I don't know what comes over me. It will never happen again. I hate that I did that to you. And maybe you believe him. And for a while, two weeks, maybe three, things are different. He's careful, measured, the house feels lighter. And then there's another argument, and the yelling returns. Another apology follows, just as sincere as the last one, maybe even more eloquent. He's had more practice at this part now. Six months later, the behavior hasn't changed, but the apologies have gotten more detailed, more specific. He names what he did, he uses the right words, he even anticipates what you're going to say and says it first. The apology evolved. The pattern didn't. What you're watching when you watch the apology is his emotional state in that moment. What you need to watch, whether yelling is still the tool he reaches for in conflict six months from now when no apology is pending. Scenario two, co-parenting after separation, the he's changed phase. You've left, the relationship is over, and almost immediately after separation, he becomes, in his words, and by every external appearance, a changed man. He's reading books, he's in therapy, he's texting with emotional depth and insight that he never showed during the marriage. He's showing up for the kids. He's respectful when you pick them up. He posts about growth on social media. And you find yourself wondering, was I wrong? Is this who he always could have been? Did leaving somehow produce the person I always needed him to be inside of the marriage? And here's what I want to offer you. Watch for what happens the first time his access is limited, the first time you make a parenting decision that he doesn't agree with, the first time that you set a co-parenting boundary that inconveniences him, the first time he perceives that he might lose something. Because performance of accountability is sustained by the fear of loss. The moment that fear reduces, when you're established in the co-parenting arrangement, when your legal proceedings settle, when the acute threat of losing you permanently is no longer fresh, watch what returns. Genuine change shows up consistently regardless of the stakes. It doesn't require the threat of losing something to maintain. Scenario three, the tactic switch. Same harm, different delivery. You tell him, when you call me names, it really hurts me. He hears you, he says he's sorry, he's genuinely trying, and the next argument comes. And he doesn't call you names. Instead, he rolls his eyes, he mocks your tone, he laughs while you're crying, he tells you you're being too emotional, he goes quiet in a way that lasts for days and teaches you without a word that raising concerns has a cost. Do you see what happened? The specific behavior changed, the impact didn't, the harm didn't, the control didn't. He just simply switched tools. This is one of the most important things to understand about sophisticated controlling behavior. It adapts. When one tactic stops working because you've named it, because it started too many arguments, because the therapist identified it, it doesn't necessarily disappear, it just evolves. Which is why the question is never did this specific behavior change? The question is, is the overall pattern becoming healthier? Is there more safety, more respect, more equity in this relationship over time? Or are we playing the same game with updated rules? Scenario 4, intermittent reinforcement and the on-off version. Every time you start to pull away, every time you get quiet, every time you start to build some emotional distance, every time leaving starts to feel like a real possibility, he becomes the man you fell in love with. He starts helping around the house without being asked. He plans something special. He's present in a way he hasn't been in months. He looks at you differently. He says the right things. He is in this window, someone you could imagine building more of a life with. And something in you responds to that. How could it not? This is what you've wanted. This is the version of the relationship that you've been holding on to. This is proof that it's possible. Until you stop talking about leaving. And then gradually, quietly, that version recedes. The help stops, the attention wonders, the distance returns. What you're experiencing is not inconsistency. It's a system operating exactly as designed. His behavior is tracking your emotional availability. When you're close, there's no threat. When you're moving away, behavior adjusts to bring you back. This is not love becoming visible, this is access management. And scenario five, the good dad argument, still in contact because of the children. You see the pattern, you've named it to yourself, you understand what you're living, that you have children with this person, and he is genuinely, visibly, inarguably a good dad. And you've been told by family or by your own internal voice that these things should balance each other out, that his fatherhood is relevant to the question of what's happening to you. That because he's good with the kids, maybe you're misreading the other parts. What I want to say clearly is this someone being a loving and present parent can coexist with that same person being harmful to their partner. The children can adore him. He can show up for school events and know their teachers' names and be genuinely engaged with their lives. All of that can be completely real. And the question of how he treats you is a separate question, not a lesser question, a separate one. Both things can be true simultaneously. Neither cancels out the other. What you've been watching, the apologies, the tears, the therapy appointments, the flowers, the good weeks, the hopeful conversations, those things tell you about his emotional state in that moment. The pattern tells you about his character over time. Start watching the pattern. Maybe they grew up in homes where nobody apologized, where conflict ended in explosion or silence or pretending nothing happened, where the emotionally powerful person in the room simply never had to reckon with their impact on others. So let's talk about what genuine accountability actually looks like in real specific, recognizable terms. Real accountability doesn't need an audience. Here's one of the clearest markers. Genuine change doesn't perform itself. It doesn't need to be witnessed or acknowledged or pointed to as evidence of something. If someone says, I'm working on not interrupting you, real accountability isn't them remembering not to interrupt when they know you're watching. It's that six months from now you realize during an ordinary Tuesday conversation that they don't interrupt you anymore. You didn't have to remind them, you didn't have to bring it up. The behavior simply changed quietly, consistently, without fanfare. Next, real accountability can tolerate your distrust. This one is crucial, and I don't think it gets named often enough. If someone has lied to you repeatedly, significantly, in ways that fractured the foundation of what you thought you were building, real accountability doesn't become irritated that you're still cautious. It doesn't say you just need to trust me. It doesn't treat your wariness as an insult or your caution as a punishment. Real accountability says, I understand why this is hard. I broke something real. I know rebuilding takes time and consistency, and that I don't get to set the timeline for when you feel safe again. And then it tells the truth every time, even when the truth is uncomfortable, even when no one would have known otherwise. Because integrity isn't something you perform when someone's watching, it's who you become when no one is. Next, real accountability looks different in conflict. The most revealing moments for real versus performed change is the next difficult conversation. Old pattern when you raise a concern could be you're always criticizing me. Nothing I do is ever good enough. You're just trying to start a fight. The focus moves immediately to his experience instead of your concern, making your original concern disappear into his defensiveness. Real accountability, when you raise the same concern, says, I can see why that hurt you. Tell me more about what that feels like, or even, and this is important, I'm feeling defensive right now and I need a minute, but I want to come back to this. Do you hear the difference? One is trying to end the discomfort, the other is trying to understand the impact. One makes the conversation about him, the other keeps the conversation where it started with your experience. Next, real accountability doesn't require you to carry the evidence. In relationships where controlling behavior has been present, women often become the unofficial archivist. They remember every incident, every apology, every pattern because they've learned that if they don't hold it, it disappears. The next conversation will happen as if none of the previous ones did. Real accountability changes that. Is genuinely doing the work, you stop being the one who has to maintain the record. The accountability becomes self-sustaining. They bring it up, they connect current behavior to past patterns. They don't need you to remind them why something matters. Next, real accountability gets boring. I know that sounds strange, but this is one of the truest things I can tell you. Real change eventually becomes consistent, and consistent over time becomes predictable. And predictable in the best possible sense becomes boring. You stop wondering which version of him you're getting today. You stop monitoring the energy when he walks into the door. You stop doing the mental calculation before you bring something up. There is a steadiness that develops, not because nothing hard ever happens, but because the hard things get handled in a way that feels safe. That is what emotional safety actually feels like from the inside. Not drama resolved, the absence of the need to brace. And last, real accountability doesn't ask for credit. This one trips people up. In the early stages of genuine change, someone may feel the need for acknowledgement. That's human and it's not automatically disqualifying. But over time, real change stops needing to be noticed. The question shifts from, don't you see how much I'm trying? to simply trying without the audience requirement, without needing you to affirm the effort in order to sustain it. Real accountability asks, what kind of person do I need to become so this never happens again? Performing accountability asks, what do I need to say so she'll forgive me? One of those questions ends the conversation. The other one changes the life. People sometimes ask me, can abusers change? And my answer is some people do. Genuinely, I've watched it happen. It's not impossible, but it is rare. And not because people are inherently incapable, because genuine change from controlling patterns requires something extraordinarily difficult. Giving up something that has been working. Here's what I mean. If yelling gets compliance, if intimidation reliably produces the outcome you want, if guilt consistently brings someone back when they try to pull away, then those behaviors are serving a purpose. They're not random, they're functional, they produce results. That doesn't mean someone consciously decides each morning to manipulate their partner. Often these patterns have become completely automatic. They developed in childhood, they were reinforced over years. They don't feel like choices anymore, they just feel like how things work. But real change requires recognizing that these automatic behaviors are harming someone that you say you love, and then choosing repeatedly to behave differently, even when the old behavior would have worked, even when the new behavior is uncomfortable, even when no one is watching, and the easier path is right there. That is a genuinely enormous thing to ask of a person. And most people don't do it. Not because they're monsters, because it's hard and the motivation is often insufficient. The motivation that produces performance of accountability, the fear of losing the relationship, fear of consequences, desire for things to go back to normal is almost never sufficient for genuine change. Because the moment the threat reduces, the motivation does too, and the behavior returns. The motivation that produces real change is different. It looks like I am genuinely confronted with the harm that I've caused. I am genuinely horrified, and I am willing to do whatever work is required for as long as it takes not to get you back, but because I don't want to be the person who does this anymore. That motivation is rare. It exists, but it is rare. Which is why instead of asking, can he change? a question that puts you in the position of either hoping or giving up, I want to encourage a different question. What evidence do I actually have? Not promises, not intentions, not this good week or that sincere conversation. What is the consistent behavioral overtime evidence that the pattern is genuinely different? Hope without evidence is not love. It is not loyalty. Eventually, it becomes self-betrayal. And you deserve better than that. So I want to give you something practical to take out of this episode, a framework that you can actually use, not just an understanding of the problem, but a way of evaluating what you're seeing in your own situation. Instead of watching the apology, the tears, the therapy appointments, the flowers, watch these things instead. First, watch what happens the next time there's conflict. The apology and the good week are not your data. The next difficult conversation is your data. When you raise something that matters to you, something that requires him to tolerate discomfort, take responsibility, or hear something unflattering about himself, what happens? Does he move toward you or away from you? Does he take responsibility or redistribute it? Next, watch for accountability that was never requested. One of the clearest signs of genuine change is when someone names their own behavior before you do. Not because you brought it up, not in response to something you said, just because they noticed it, recognized it as harmful, and named it without being prompted. That kind of unprompted self-awareness is significant. It is very different from responsive accountability, which is acknowledging something only after it's been raised, named, and sometimes argued about. Next, watch what happens to you physically. This one is underused and it is powerful. Your nervous system knows things before your mind does. Are you more relaxed in his presence than you used to be? Do you feel less like you're monitoring and managing and more like you're just simply living? When you hear his key in the door, what happens in your body? Safety is felt before it is intellectually confirmed. If you are still bracing regularly, still walking on eggshells, still doing the pre-conversation calculation, that information matters. Whatever is being said about change, your nervous system is recording something different. Next, watch consistency across time and circumstance. Six weeks is not a data point. Six months across varying circumstances, including difficult ones, stressful ones, one where old behavior would have been triggered, that starts to mean something. Ask yourself, has this changed in high stress situations? When he's under pressure from work, when something goes wrong, when the kids are difficult, when you have a disagreement about something real, does the new behavior hold or does it only exist when things are easy? Genuine change is consistent under pressure. Performance typically isn't. And last, what does he do with your doubt? Does he become frustrated or impatient when you're still cautious, implying that your distrust is unfair or unkind? Or does he understand that trust was broken and you get to set the timeline for when it returns? Someone who is genuinely changing can sit with your doubt without making it a problem you have to manage. That tolerance of your wariness, that willingness to earn trust without demanding it, is one of the quietest and most meaningful signs available to you. Maybe you have children and the logistics feel unsurvivable. Maybe you don't have the financial independence to leave safely right now. Maybe you're in a legal situation that requires strategic timing. Maybe you're afraid of what happens when you do. Maybe you are, for any of a hundred real and legitimate reasons, not in a position to leave today. I want to say two things to you. First, I hear you. Leaving is not always possible in the moment someone recognizes that they're in. That reality doesn't make you weak and it does not make you complicit. It makes you someone navigating genuinely difficult circumstances without a simple exit. Second, healing does not begin the day you leave. It begins the day you stop abandoning yourself. Those are two very different timelines. And the second one is available to you right now wherever you are. Here's what I mean in practical terms. Instead of beginning every morning by asking, what mood is he in today, ask yourself, how am I doing today? Not as a replacement for the other question. You know you'll still ask that one regardless, but as an addition, as a small act of returning to yourself before you go outward. And instead of spending your energy managing his reactions, spend a small portion of that same energy noticing your own reactions, not to analyze them or fix them, just to acknowledge them. I felt hurt just now. I felt dismissed just now. I disagreed just now, even if I didn't say it. Noticing is the beginning of knowing yourself again. And instead of making yourself invisible as a protective strategy, practice existing slightly more fully in spaces that are safe. A conversation with a friend where you say what you're actually thinking, a small decision made for yourself without running it through a filter, a preference expressed even briefly, even quietly. None of these are dramatic acts. They are tiny and they matter enormously, not because they change the relationship, but because they slowly reconnect you to yourself. And that reconnection is what makes everything else eventually on whatever timeline works for your actual life possible. You do not have to have left in order to have started. The woman who is still in it but is quietly paying attention to her own experience, building one thread of connection to herself, remembering what she actually thinks and feels, she has already begun, and that beginning counts. I want to leave you with one final thought before we close, and this is it. So many women spend years looking for evidence that he is changing. They analyze every conversation, every apology, every good week, every moment of affection, every session, every post, looking for the proof that will let them know what to do. Meanwhile, they completely miss the evidence that matters most. Their own. One day, and I've watched this happen for enough women now that I'm saying it not as inspiration, but what I've actually witnessed. One day you'll notice something. You're calmer than you used to be. Not because everything is calm around you, but because something in you has found a different ground to stand on. You're not arguing against every accusation anymore, not because you've stopped disagreeing, but because you've stopped needing the argument to be one. You're trusting your instincts in small ways, noticing when something feels wrong and not immediately talking yourself out of it. You're saying no to things that used to feel automatic to agree to. You're explaining yourself less. You're making decisions without first calculating his reaction. You're building something, a friendship, an interest, a small corner of life that is entirely yours, that exists independently of whether this relationship changes. You're becoming someone you recognize. And maybe whether he changes or not, that recognition is not something that depends on anyone else's decisions anymore. That is the relationship that no one can take from you, the one that you're building with yourself. That is why I created Pattern Breakers Collective, not only to help women leave unhealthy situations, but to help them become women who never have to lose themselves inside of one again. Women who know what they're seeing, women who trust what they know, women who, wherever they are, have stopped abandoning the most important person in the room. If today's episode resonated with you, I have two favors to ask. First, share this episode with one woman who needs to hear it. She doesn't have to be in crisis. She might just be asking herself that quiet, constant question, but what if he's really changing? She needs someone to help her look in the right direction. Second, if you haven't yet, please leave a review wherever you listen. Those reviews help other women find these conversations where they're searching for answers that they can't quite put into words. 60 seconds, it genuinely matters. And if you're ready to move beyond understanding, if you want actual, supported, practical work on recognizing these patterns, rebuilding yourself, and changing the way you show up in every relationship you have, the 12-week program is where we do that together. Details are on my socials or at patternbreakerscollective.com. Reach out anytime. And now stop looking for evidence that he's changing. Start noticing the evidence that you are. Keep breaking every pattern that was never yours to carry on.